Historical and Philosophical Foundations of the Bioethics Development in Latin America: From the Colonial Legacy to the Philosophy of Liberation

Authors

  • Sergey Druzhkin Moscow City University (Moscow)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2025.6.2.144-152

Keywords:

bioethics, Latin America, social justice, liberation philosophy, multilayered vulnerability, Catholic Church, vulnerable groups, patient autonomy, neocolonialism, global bioethics

Abstract

 The article is devoted to the analysis of the formation and development of bioethics in Latin America, where traditional Western principles face unique (regionally determined) socio-economic and socio-cultural realities. The purpose of the study is to identify the specifics of bioethics in Latin America, focusing on issues of social justice, protection of vulnerable groups and criticism of neocolonialism. The author applies historical, philosophical and comparative methods, analyzing the works of key thinkers (Florencia Luna, Ruth Macklin, Enrique Dussel) and the influence of factors such as liberation philosophy, Catholic ethics and social inequality. The study shows that in the process of bioethics formation in Latin America, universal principles (autonomy, benevolence, non-harm and justice) are integrated with the local context, which leads to the formation of approaches aimed at overcoming structural violence and marginalization. The concept of the Luna's "multi-layered vulnerability" reveals the complex impact of economic, gender, and cultural factors on access to medicine. At the same time, discussions about reproductive rights and the protection of indigenous peoples demonstrate a conflict between global standards and local traditions. The article's conclusions emphasize that bioethics research in Latin America makes a significant contribution to global discourse by offering a model that combines ethical principles with active social policy. This is especially true in the context of pandemics, environmental crises and increasing inequality.

Author Biography

Sergey Druzhkin, Moscow City University (Moscow)

Assistant at the Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences

References

Левинас, Э. (1998). Время и другой. Пер. с фр. А. В. Парибка. СПб.: Высшая религиозно-философская школа. 264 с.

Levinas, E. (1998). Time and the Other. Paribka, A. V (transl.). St. Petersburg. 264 p. (In Russ.)

Фриц, Я. (2013). Биоэтика: об этике отношений человека к животным и растениям. Пер. с нем. Б. Г. Юдина. Человек. № 6. С. 50-53.

Fritz, Ya. (2013). Bioethics: on the Ethics of Human Relations to Animals and Plants. Yudin, B. G. (transl.). Human. No. 6. Pp. 50-53. (In Russ.)

Швейцер, А. (1973). Культура и этика. Пер. с нем. Н. А. Захарченко и Г. В. Колшанского. М.: Прогресс. 342 с.

Schweitzer, A. (1973). Culture and Ethics. Zakharchenko, N. A. and Kolshansky, G. V. (transl.). Moscow. 342 p. (In Russ.)

Beauchamp, T. L., Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford. Oxford University Press. 454 p.

Dussel, E. (2006). Ética de la liberación en la edad de la globalización y de la exclusión. México. Trotta. 661 p.

Feitosa, S. F., Garrafa, V., Cornelli, G., Tardivo, C., Carvalho, S. J. (2010). Bioethics, Culture and Infanticide in Brazilian Indigenous Communities: the Zuruahá case. Cadernos de Saude Publica. Vol. 26. No. 5. Pp. 853-865.

Grosfoguel, R. (2003). Colonial Subjects: Puerto Ricans in a Global Perspective. Berkeley. Univ. of California press, cop. 268 с.

Garrafa, V., Porto, D. (2003). Bioethics, Power and Injustice: for an Ethics of Intervention. Journal International de Bioethique = International Journal of Bioethics. Vol. 14(1). Pp. 23-40. https://doi.org/10.3917/JIB.141.0023.

Gracia, D. (2001). History of Medical Ethics. In Have, H., Gordijn, B. (eds.). Bioethics in a European Perspective. Switzerland. Springer Netherlands. Pp. 17-50.

Have, H., Gordijn, B. (eds). (2013). Handbook of Global Bioethics. Springer, Dordrecht. 1685 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2512-6.

Luna, F., Macklin, R. (1996). Bioethics in Argentina: A Country Report. Bioethics. Vol. 10. No. 2. Pp. 140-153.

Luna, F. (1999). ¿Procrear o no Procrear? Sida y Derechos Reproductivos. Analisis Filosofico. Vol. 19. No. 2. Pp. 153-172.

Luna, F. (2006). Bioethics and Vulnerability: A Latin American View. Amsterdam. Rodopi. 177 p.

Luna, F. (2009). Elucidating the Concept of Vulnerability: Layers Not Labels. IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics. No. 1(2). Pp. 121-139.

Luna, F. (2013). Infertilidad en Latinoamérica. En Busca de un Nuevo Modelo. Revista de Bioética y Derecho. No. 28. Pp. 33-47.

Macklin, R. (1998). Ethical Relativism in a Multicultural Society. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. No. 8(2). Pp. 411-427.

Macklin, R. (1999). Against Relativism: Cultural Diversity and the Search for Ethical Universals in Medicine. Oxford. Oxford University Press. 290 p.

Macklin, R. (2012). Global Bioethics: Narrow or Broad? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. No. 37(2). Pp. 17-38.

Pessini, L., Barchifontaine, C. P., Stepke, F. L. (eds.). (2010). Ibero-American Bioethics. History and Perspectives. Springer. Dordrecht. 397 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9350-0.

Possamai, V. R., Siqueira-Batista, R. (2022). Schramm and Kottow’s Bioethics of Protection: Principles, Scopes and Conversations. Revista Bioética. Vol. 30. No. 1. Pp. 10-18.

Potter, V. R. (1971). Bioethics: Bridge to the Future. Englewood Cliffs. Prentice-Hall. 205 p.

Schramm, F. R., Kottow, M. (2001). Principios bioéticos en salud pública: limitaciones y propuestas [Bioethical Principles in Public Health: Limitations and Proposals]. Cadernos de Saude Publica. Vol. 17 (4). Pp. 949-956. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x2001000400029.

Tealdi, J. C. (ed.). (2008). Diccionario Latinoamericano de Bioética. Bogotá. UNESCO – Red Latinoamericana y del Caribe de Bioética. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. 660 p.

Published

2025-06-15

How to Cite

Druzhkin С. М. (2025). Historical and Philosophical Foundations of the Bioethics Development in Latin America: From the Colonial Legacy to the Philosophy of Liberation. Respublica Literaria, 6(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2025.6.2.144-152

Issue

Section

SOCIOCULTURAL IDENTITY AND HISTORICAL DYNAMICS