Adaptation of science to new conditions of activity: strategies and assessments by the scientific community (1990s – first half of 2000s)

Authors

  • Anatoly Ablazhey Institute of Philosophy and Law SB RAS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2023.4.3.90-103

Keywords:

post-Soviet period, academic science, Siberian branch, adaptation, strategy, operating conditions, funding sources

Abstract

The article describes the dramatic period in the history of Russian science associated with the transition to the post-Soviet period of its existence. There are two types of sources as the empirical basis of the analysis. The first is official materials (speeches by the leaders of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, concepts and development programs, reports on the activities of the Branch). Such materials describe the main trends in the development of the official strategy of the Branch for work in the new conditions. The second is the results of mass sociological studies conducted among researchers of the Novosibirsk Scientific Center in 1996 and 2004, which made it possible to identify the dynamics of adaptation processes at the personal, everyday, routine level. We conclude that despite the relative stabilization, including the growth of funding and the consolidation of the number of researchers, academic science still relied primarily on state support, it was not possible to build a market-oriented science. Under such conditions, a radical reform of the methods of managing academic science, primarily its property complex, became only a matter of time.

Author Biography

Anatoly Ablazhey, Institute of Philosophy and Law SB RAS

Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Leading Researcher

References

Гордиенко, А. А., Плюснин, Ю. М. (1995). Научное сообщество Академгородка в период трансформации общественной жизни России. Мониторинг социально-психологического состояния научных коллективов ННЦ в 1992–1995 гг. Новосибирск.

Gordienko, A. A., Plusnin, Yu. M. (1995). The scientific community of Akademgorodok in the period of public life in Russia transformation: socio-psychological aspect (monitoring of the socio-psychological status the scientific teams in the NSC in 1992–1995). Novosibirsk. (In Russ.)

Колесова, О. В. (2007). Территория науки. СО РАН: хроники к юбилею. Новосибирск.

Kolesova, O. V. (2007). Territory of Science: chronicle for the jubilee. Novosibirsk. (In Russ.)

Концепция адаптации и реформирования СО РАН и меры по ее реализации (Принята на Общем собрании Сибирского отделения РАН 13 марта 1998 года). (1998). [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.sbras.ru/files/files/rep/rep1997/kar.html (дата обращения: 11.08.2023).

The concept of adaptation and reform of the SB RAS and measures for its implementation (Adopted at the General Meeting of the Siberian Branch of the RAS on March 13, 1998). (1998). [Online]. Available at: https://www.sbras.ru/files/files/rep/rep1997/kar.html (Accessed: 11 August 2023). (In Russ.)

Коптюг, В. А. (1996а). О возможных путях реорганизации структуры академического научного сообщества. Российская наука: состояние и проблемы развития. Всероссийский семинар 19–21 сентября 1996 г. Новосибирск. С. 13-22.

Koptug, V. A. (1996a). On possible ways of reorganizing the structure of the academic scientific community. Russian science: state and problems of development. All-Russian seminar September 19–21, 1996. Novosibirsk. pp. 13-22. (In Russ.)

Коптюг, В. А. (1996б). Об организационной работе президиума Сибирского Отделения РАН за 1991–1996 годы. Доклад председателя СО РАН академика В. Коптюга на Общем собрании Отделения 30 октября 1996 г. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.sbras.ru/files/files/rep/m1996/vac-96.html (дата обращения: 28.07.2023).

Koptug, V. A. (1996b). On the organizational work of the Presidium of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences for 1991–1996. Report of the Chairman of the SB RAS Academician V. Koptyug at the General Meeting of the Branch on October 30, 1996. [Online]. Available at: https://www.sbras.ru/files/files/rep/m1996/vac-96.html (Accessed: 28 July 2023). (In Russ.)

Мирская, Е. З. (2003). Профессиональное самочувствие российских академических ученых. Вестник Российского гуманитарного научного фонда. № 1. С. 211-218.

Mirskaya, E. Z. (2003). Professional well-being of Russian academic scientists. Bulletin of the Russian state humanity found. no. 1. pp. 211-218. (In Russ.)

Отчет о деятельности СО РАН в 2004 г. Показатели финансирования в 2004 г. (2004). [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.sbras.ru/files/files/rep/rep2004/tom3/1_2.pdf (дата обращения: 01.08.2023).

Report on the activities of the SB RAS in 2004. Funding indicators in 2004. (2004). [Online]. Available at: https://www.sbras.ru/files/files/rep/rep2004/tom3/1_2.pdf (Accessed: 1 August 2023). (In Russ.)

Российская академия наук. Сибирское отделение. Исторический очерк. (2007). Новосибирск.

The Russian Academy of Sciences. Siberian branch. Historical essay. (2007). Novosibirsk. (In Russ.)

Юревич, А. В. (1998). Умные, но бедные: ученые в современной России. М.

Yurevich, A. V. (1998). Smart but poor: scientists in modern Russia. Moscow. (In Russ.)

Юревич, А. В., Цапенко, И. П. (2010). Наука в современном российском обществе. М.

Yurevich, A. V., Tsapenko, I. P. (2010). Science in the modern Russian society. Moscow. (In Russ.)

Published

2023-10-09

How to Cite

Ablazhey А. М. (2023). Adaptation of science to new conditions of activity: strategies and assessments by the scientific community (1990s – first half of 2000s). Respublica Literaria, 4(3), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2023.4.3.90-103