Zeno’s Aporias “Through the Looking-Glass” (A Reverence to I. V. Berestov’s Article “How Achilles and Hector Missed Each Other”)

Authors

  • Alexander Nechiporenko Novosibirsk State Research University (NSU)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2022.3.4.58-67

Keywords:

Zeno of Elea, aporias, movement, kinetics, statics, state, transition, continuum, set, interval, potential infinity, actual infinity, intention, operation.

Abstract

This text is written as a detailed remark in the discussion about the article by I. V. Berestov. The main goal of the tactic is to show that the reasoning of I. V. Berestov are not related to the problematics and the conceivability of movement, i.e., to the actual problems of Zeno; in fact, the author is working on the set-theoretic problems of the continuum. The text contains mental experiments and counterexamples that play on the logical constructions of I. V. Berestov. In opposition to I. V. Berestov's approach, the author of the text cites his own experience of reconstructing a fragment of Zeno's aporia “Arrow”.

Author Biography

Alexander Nechiporenko, Novosibirsk State Research University (NSU)

Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Senior Lecturer

References

Берестов, И. В. (2022). Как Ахиллес с Гектором разминулся: затруднение в теории движения, разводящей прохождение открытого интервала и его замыкания. Respublica Literaria. Т. 3. № 4. С. 5-27. DOI: 10.47850/RL.2022.3.4.5-27

Berestov, I. V. (2022). How Achilles and Hector Missed Each Other: A Difficulty in the Theory of Motion That Distinguish the Passage of an Open Space Interval from the Passage of its Closure. Respublica Literaria. Vol. 3. no. 4. pp. 5-27. DOI: 10.47850/RL.2022.3.4.5-27 (In Russ.)

Кушнаренко, С. П. (2013). Философские проблемы математики: учебное пособие. Новосибирск. Новосибирский государственный архитектурно-строительный университет (НГАСУ). 156 с.

Kushnarenko, S. P. (2013). Philosophical problems of mathematics: a textbook. Novosibirsk. 156 p. (In Russ.)

Кассирер, Э. (2006). Познание и действительность. Понятие субстанции и понятие функции. М. ИТДК «Гнозис». 400 с.

Cassirer, E. (2006). Cognition and reality. The concept of substance and the concept of function. Moscow. 400 p. (In Russ.)

Щедровицкий, Г. П. (1995). Избранные труды. Ред.-сост. А. А. Пископпель, Л. П. Щедровицкий. М. Школа Культурной Политики. 800 с.

Shchedrovitsky, G. P. (1995). Selected works. Piskoppel, A. A., Shchedrovitsky, L. P. (eds., comp.). Moscow. 800 p. (In Russ.)

Spencer, B. G. (1972). Laws of Form. New York. [Online]. Available at: http://www.siese.org/modulos/biblioteca/b/G-Spencer-Brown-Laws-of-Form.pdf (Accessed: 21 October 2022).

Published

2022-12-28

How to Cite

Nechiporenko А. В. . (2022). Zeno’s Aporias “Through the Looking-Glass” (A Reverence to I. V. Berestov’s Article “How Achilles and Hector Missed Each Other”). Respublica Literaria, 3(4), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2022.3.4.58-67