Dramatic Approach in Plato Studies: The Form of Dialogue as a Methodological Problem of Interpretation

Authors

  • Vitaliy Karimov Institute of Philosophy and Law SB RAS (Novosibirsk)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2026.7.3.25-37

Keywords:

Plato, methodology for analyzing corpus dialogues, the dramatic approach, structure and form of dialogue

Abstract

This article discusses the dramatic approach to the study of Plato’s texts, which takes shape as a multi-level methodology encompassing J. Press’s historiographical reinterpretation of the dialogue, T. V. Vasilyeva’s philosophical interpretation of form, and I. A. Protopopova’s analysis of its textual structure. Particular attention is paid to the crisis in Platonic studies during the second half of the 20th century, which stemmed from the contradiction between proponents of the dramatic approach – who emphasie the artistic form in their analysis of the dialogues – and proponents of doctrinalism, who rely on logical inferences and definitions. By analyzing the form and structure of the dialogues, the author identifies the cause of the divergence in interpretations of the corpus of the dialogues. The author also challenges T. V. Vasilyeva’s dramatic thesis that all definitions provided by Plato in the dialogues are based on analogy.

Author Biography

Vitaliy Karimov, Institute of Philosophy and Law SB RAS (Novosibirsk)

Phd Student, Junior Researcher

References

Анонимные пролегомены к платоновской философии. (1986). Пер. с древнегреч. Т. Ю. Бородай, А. А. Пичхадзе. Платон. Диалоги. Под общ. ред. А. Ф. Лосева, А. А. Тахо-Годи. М.: Мысль. С. 476-505.

Anonymous Prolegomena to Platonic Philosophy. (1986). Borodai, T. Yu., Pichkhadze, A. A. (transl.). In Plato. Dialogues. Losev, A. F., Takho-Godi, A. A. (eds). Moscow. Pp. 476-505. (In Russ.)

Васильева, Т. В. (2008). Поэтика античной философии. М.: Академический проект; Трикста. 735 с.

Vasilyeva, T. V. (2008). Poetics of Ancient Philosophy. Moscow. 735 p. (In Russ.)

Лосев, А. Ф. (1993). Вводные замечания. Платон. Собрание сочинений: в 4 т. Т. 2. Под ред. А. Ф. Лосева, В. Ф. Асмуса, А. А. Тахо-Годи. М.: Мысль. С. 3-8.

Losev, A. F. (1993). Introductory remarks. In Plato. Collected works. In 4 vols. Vol. 2. Losev, A. F., Asmus, V. F., Takho-Godi, A. A. (eds.). Moscow. Pp. 3-8. (In Russ.)

Платон. (1994). Государство. Платон. Собрание сочинений: в 4 т. Т. 3. Под ред. А. Ф. Лосева, В. Ф. Асмуса, А. А. Тахо-Годи. М.: Мысль. С. 37-420.

Plato. (1994). The Republic. In Plato. Collected works. In 4 vols. Vol. 3. Losev, A. F., Asmus, V. F., Takho-Godi, A. A. (eds.). Moscow. Pp. 37-420. (In Russ.)

Протопопова, И. А. (2012). Прыгающий лебедь: о драматическом подходе к диалогам Платона. Логос. № 6. С. 85-100.

Protopopova, I. A. (2012). The Jumping Swan: On the Dramatic Approach to Plato’s Dialogues. Logos. No. 6. Pp. 85-100. (In Russ.)

Соловьев, В. С. (1988). Сочинения: в 2 т. Т. 2. М.: Мысль. 822 с. (Философское наследие; т. 105).

Solovyov, V. S. (1998). Collected works. In 2 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow. 822 p. (Philosophycal Heritage; vol. 105). (In Russ.)

Шичалин, Ю. А. (2020). Институциональный подход к античным философским текстам (на примере диалога «Ион»). Логос. Т. 30. № 6. С. 29-46.

Shichalin, Yu. A. (2020). Institutional Approach to Ancient Philosophical Texts (by the Example of the Dialogue “Ion”). Logos. Vol. 30. No. 6. Pp. 29-46. (In Russ.)

Press, G. A. (1996). The state of the Question in the Study of Plato. The Southern Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 34. No. 4. Pp. 507-532.

Published

2026-10-03

How to Cite

Karimov В. В. (2026). Dramatic Approach in Plato Studies: The Form of Dialogue as a Methodological Problem of Interpretation. Respublica Literaria, 7(3), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2026.7.3.25-37