University: Genesis and Transformation of an Idea

Authors

  • Sergey Smirnov Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2021.2.3.133-152

Keywords:

university, idea of a university, science, education, W. von Humboldt, K. Jaspers, I. Kant, M. Heidegger, education, university models

Abstract

The article is devoted to the birth and transformation of the Idea of the University as an institutional form within the German spiritual culture of the 19th – 20th centuries. The author traces the history of the Idea of the University from the works of I. Kant (through the prism of his idea of the Enlightenment), then in the works of W. von Humboldt, the attempt to revive the Idea in the works of K. Jaspers, and the death of the idea during Nazism on the example of the “Heidegger case” The article specifically examines the basic principles of the University of W. von Humboldt – academic freedom and unity of science and education. The latter is considered not in a narrow academic sense, but in the classical – the formation of a person's image, chasing his appearance. W. von Humboldt assumed the unity of three universes: the universe of man, the universe of knowledge and the university as an institution that creates conditions for “solitude and freedom”.

Further, the author shows the transformation of the university in the modern world in connection with the change in the time vector, the reorientation of the educational paradigm from the past to the future and the search, in this connection, of a new identity for universities. Despite the actual death of the classical idea of the University of W. von Humboldt, the author shows that this idea can be revived in a new model of an entrepreneurial university, which also contains the basic principle of W. von Humboldt, which presupposes a constant scientific search and the formation of a person for whom personal development remains a value.

Author Biography

Sergey Smirnov , Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Leading Researcher of the Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

References

Гумбольдт, В. фон (2002). О внутренней и внешней организации высших учебных заведений в Берлине. Неприкосновенный запас. № 2. С. 5-10.

Humboldt, W. von (2002). On the Internal and External Organization of Higher Education Institutions in Berlin. Emergency Reserve. no 2. pp. 5-10. (In Russ.)

Йегер, В. (2001). Пайдейя: Воспитание античного грека. Т. 1. М. Греко-латинский кабинет Ю. А. Шичалина.

Yeager, V. (2001). Paideia: The Education of the Ancient Greek. Vol. 1. Moscow. (In Russ.)

Коява, Л. В., Новгородов, П. А., Смирнов, С. А. (2018). Предпринимательский университет. Концепт. Современная конкуренция. Т. 12. № 4(70)-5(71). С. 93-105.

Koyava, L. V., Novgorodov, P. A., Smirnov, S. A. (2018). Entrepreneurial University. Concept. Modern Competition. Vol. 12. no. 4(70)-5(71). pp. 93-105. (In Russ.)

Люббе, Г. (2013). Гельмут Шельски как основатель университета. Логос. № 1(91). С. 87-99.

Lubbe, G. (2013). Helmut Schelski as the Founder of the University. Logos. no. 1(91). pp. 87-99. (In Russ.)

Кант, И. (1966). Сочинения: в 6 т. Т. 6. М. Мысль.

Kant, I. (1966). Essays: In 6 vols. Vol. 6. Moscow. (In Russ.)

Константинов, Г. Н., Филонович, С. Р. (2007). Что такое предпринимательский университет. Вопросы образования. № 1. С. 49-62.

Constantinov, G. N., Filonovich, S. R. (2007) What is an Entrepreneurial University. Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow. no. 1. pp. 49-62. (In Russ.)

Сафрански, Р. (2002). Хайдеггер. Германский мастер и его время. Пер. с нем. Т. А. Баскаковой при участии В. А. Брун-Цехового. М. Молодая Гвардия.

Safranski, R. (2002). Heidegger. The German Master and His Time. Baskakova, T. A., Brun-Tsekhovoy, V. A. (transl.). Moscow. (In Russ.)

Смирнов, С. А. (2008). Российская высшая школа: на пути к новым институциям. Вестник НГУЭУ. № 1. С. 232-241.

Smirnov, S. A. (2008). Russian Higher School: On the Way to New Institutions. Vestnik NSUEM. no. 1. pp. 232-241. (In Russ.)

Смирнов, С. А. (2014). Форсайт: от прогноза к социальной инженерии. Вестник НГУЭУ. № 3. С. 10-30.

Smirnov, S. A. (2014). Foresight: From Forecasting to Social Engineering. Vestnik NSUEM. no. 3. pp. 10-30. (In Russ.)

Смирнов, С. А. (2015). Прогноз и форсайт: две парадигмы будущего. Методологический аспект. Вестник НГУЭУ. № 2. С. 27-45.

Smirnov, S. A. (2015). Forecast and Foresight: Two Paradigms of the Future. Methodological Aspect. Vestnik NSUEM. no. 2. pp. 27-45. (In Russ.)

Фурман, М. (2010). Вильгельм фон Гумбольдт и Берлинский университет. Вопросы образования. № 3. С. 32-47.

Furman, M. (2010). Wilhelm Humboldt and University of Berlin. Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow. no 3. pp. 32-47. (In Russ.)

Хайдеггер, М. (1991). Разговор на проселочной дороге. М. Высшая школа.

Heidegger, M. (1991). Conversation on a Country Road. Moscow. (In Russ.)

Хайдеггер, М. (1995). Самоутверждение немецкого университета. Пер. В. В. Бибихина. Историко-философский ежегодник – 94. М. Наука. С. 298-307.

Heidegger, M. (1995). Self-assertion of a German University. Bibikhin, V. V. (transl.). Historical and Philosophical Yearbook – 94. Moscow. pp. 298-307. (In Russ.)

Хайдеггер, М. (2003). Речи М. Хайдеггера 1933–1934 годов. В кн.: Бурдье, П. Политическая онтология Мартина Хайдеггера. Пер. с франц. А. Т. Бикбова, Т. В. Анисимовой. М. Праксис. С. 245-269.

Speeches by M. Heidegger 1933–1934. (2003). In: Bourdieu, P. Political Ontology of Martin Heidegger. Bikbov, A. T., Anisimova, T. V. (transl.). Moscow. pp. 245-269. (In Russ.)

Хайдеггер, М., Ясперс, К. (2001). Переписка 1920-1963. М. Ad Marginem.

Heidegger, M., Jaspers, K. (2001). Correspondence 1920-1963. Moscow. (In Russ.)

Шнедельбах, Г. (2002). Университет Гумбольдта. Логос. № 5-6(35). С. 1-14.

Schnedelbach, G. (2002). Humboldt University. Logos. no. 5-6(35). pp. 1-14. (In Russ.)

Шельски, Г. (2013). Уединение и свобода. К социальной идее немецкого университета. Логос. № 1(91). С. 65-86.

Shelski, G. (2013). Solitude and Freedom. To the Social Idea of a German University. Logos. no. 1(91). pp. 65-86. (In Russ.)

Ясперс, К. (1991). Смысл и назначение истории. М. Политиздат.

Jaspers, K. (1991). The Meaning and Purpose of History. Moscow. (In Russ.)

Ясперс, К. (1992). Хайдеггер (глава из «Философской автобиографии»). Ступени. № 3. С. 135-151.

Jaspers, K. (1992). Heidegger (Chapter from “Philosophical Autobiography”). Steps. no. 3. pp. 135-151. (In Russ.)

Ясперс, К. (2006). Идея университета. Пер. с нем. Т. В. Тягуновой. Минск. БГУ.

Jaspers, K. (2006). The Idea of a University. Tyagunova, T. V. (transl.). Minsk. (In Russ.)

Ясперс, К. (2017). Введение в философию. Философская автобиография. Пер. А. К. Судакова. М. Канон+ РООИ «Реабилитация».

Jaspers, K. (2017). Introduction to Philosophy. Philosophical Autobiography. Sudakova, A. K. (transl.). Moscow. (In Russ.)

Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Emerald Group Publishing.

Heller, A. C. (2015). Hannah Arendt: A Life in Dark Times. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt New Harvest [Online]. Available at: http://www.annecheller.com/book/hanna-arendt-a-life-in-dark-times/ (Accessed: 26 June 2021).

Stevenson, H. H. (2000). Why Entrepreneurship Was Won! Coleman White Paper. USA SBE Plenary Address, February 17.

Stegmaier, W. (2008). Philosophie der Orientierung. Berlin; New York. Walter de Gruyter.

Published

2021-09-15

How to Cite

Smirnov С. А. (2021). University: Genesis and Transformation of an Idea. Respublica Literaria, 2(3), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2021.2.3.133-152