Biopolitics as an aspect of public administration in non-liberal political regimes (on the example of the Chinese National Republic)

Authors

  • Nikolai Kshevin Pacific State University, Khabarovsk
  • Olga Simonenko Pacific State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2021.2.2.86-97

Keywords:

biopolitics, authoritarian governance, globalization, commodification, public administration, biotechnology.

Abstract

The article focuses on the potential applicability of biopolitics to modern elements of public administration in non-liberal political regimes on the example of China. M. Foucault's biopolitics is a rather difficult concept to use for the analysis of modern countries of the East due to the initial connection of the concept to the Western intellectual tradition. Based on analysis of the various researches in biopolitics, we propose to look further into strategies for expanding the concept to determine the most suitable for the study of public administration in non-liberal political regimes on the example of the PRC. It is noted that modern China, being an example of a non-liberal political regime, has signs of biopolitical state governance. It is concluded that biopolitics as a technology of power over the population is not an exclusive part of liberal governance.

References

Агамбен, Д. (2011). Homo sacer. Суверенная власть и голая жизнь. М.: Европа.

Agamben, D. (2011). Homo sacer. Sovereign power and bare life. Moscow. (In Russ.)

Агамбен, Д. (2012). Открытое. М.: РГГУ.

Agamben, D. (2012). The Open. Moscow. (In Russ.)

Делез, Ж. (2016). Post Scriptum к обществам контроля. Пер. с фр. Н. Мелентьевой. [Электронный ресурс]. Сигма. 18.08.2016. URL: https://syg.ma/@klimov/zhil-dieliez-obshchiestvo-kontrolia (дата обращения: 08.05.2021).

Deleuze, G. (2016). Postscript on the Societies of Control. Transl. by N. Melentieva. [Online]. Sigma. 18.08.2016. URL: https://syg.ma/@klimov/zhil-dieliez-obshchiestvo-kontrolia (Accessed: 8 May 2021) (In Russ.)

Дин, М. (2016). Правительность: власть и правление в современных обществах. М.: Дело.

Dean, M. (2016). Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. Moscow. (In Russ.)

Негри, А. (2008). Труд множества и ткань биополитики. Синий диван. № 12. С. 80-92.

Negri, A. (2008). The Labor of the Multitude and the Fabric of Biopolitics. Blue sofa. no. 12. pp. 80-92. (In Russ.)

Фуко, М. (1996). Воля к истине: по ту сторону знания, власти и сексуальности. Пер. с фр. С. Табачникова. М.: Касталь.

Foucault, M. (1996). The Will to Truth: Beyond Knowledge, Power and Sexuality. Transl. by S. Tabachnikova. Moscow. (In Russ.)

Фуко, М. (2010). Рождение биополитики. Пер. с фр. А. Дьякова. СПб.: Наука.

Foucault, M. (2010). The Birth of Biopolitics. Transl. by A. Dyakova. St. Petersburg. (In Russ.)

Фуко, М. (2011). Безопасность, территория, население: курс лекций, прочитанных в Коллеж де Франс в 1977–1978 учебном году. Пер. с фр. Н. В. Суслова, А. В. Шестакова, В. Ю. Быстрова. СПб.: Наука.

Foucault, M. (2011). Security, territory, population: a course of lectures delivered at the Collège de France in the 1977-1978 academic year. Transl. by V. Yu. Bystrov, N. V. Suslov, A. V. Shestakov. Moscow. (In Russ.)

Хардт, М., Негри, A. (2004). Империя. М.: Праксис.

Hardt, M., Negri, A. (2004). Empire. Moscow. (In Russ.)

Хоркхаймер, М., Адорно, Т. (1997). Диалектика Просвещения: Философские фрагменты. М.: Медиум.

Horkheimer, M., Adorno, T. (1997). Dialectics of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Moscow. (In Russ.)

Jiang, H. (2016). Taking Down the “Great Green Wall”: The Science and Policy Discourse of Desertification and Its Control in China. [Online]. ResearchGate. Apr. 2016. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301320576_Taking_Down_the_Great_Green_Wall_The_Science_and_Policy_Discourse_of_Desertification_and_Its_Control_in_China (Accessed: 8 May 2021).

Mbembe, A. (2001). On the Postcolony. California. University of California Press.

Mbembe, A. (2015). Apartheid futures. Public positions. Johannesburg: Wits Institute for Social and Economic Research. [Online]. Central Data Catalog. URL: https://catalog.ihsn.org/index.php/citations/73212 (Accessed: 8 May 2021)

Rabinow, P. (2005). Artificiality and Enlightenment: From Sociobiology to Biosociality. Anthropologies of modernity: Foucault, governmentality, and life politics. New Jersey. Blackwell Publishing. pp. 181-193.

Rose, N. (2007). The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford. Princeton University Press.

Rose, N., Novas, C. (2005). Biological citizenship. Global assemblages: technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems. New Jersey. Blackwell Publishing. pp. 439-463.

Wang, W., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Jia, X., Li, Y. (2020). Using WeChat, a Chinese Social Media App, for Early Detection of the COVID-19 Outbreak in December 2019: Retrospective Study [Online]. JMIR Publications. 15.10.2020. URL: https://mhealth.jmir.org/2020/10/e19589/ (Accessed: 8 May 2021).

Xu, Y. (2020). One Child Policy, China. [Online]. ResearchGate. Apr. 2020. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340634606_One_Child_Policy_China (Accessed: 8 May 2021).

Published

2021-06-23 — Updated on 2021-06-24

Versions

How to Cite

Kshevin Н. В. ., & Simonenko О. А. . (2021). Biopolitics as an aspect of public administration in non-liberal political regimes (on the example of the Chinese National Republic). Respublica Literaria, 2(2), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2021.2.2.86-97 (Original work published June 23, 2021)