Actualization of the Epicurean Social Model in the Context of Patriotic Education of Future Generations: From the Ancient Polis to Modern Global Society

Authors

  • Maria Netesova Tomsk Polytechnic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2026.7.3.38-53

Keywords:

Epicureanism, Epicurus’ “Garden”, small communities, patriotic education, digital subjectivity, cultural memory

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to identify a socio-philosophical reinterpretation of Epicurus’ legacy as a model of microsocial organization relevant to the patriotic education of future generations. The novelty of the work lies in the interpretation of Epicurean small communities as mediators between the individual and society, fostering trust, solidarity, and responsible participation. In this context, patriotic education is understood as the formation of responsible subject of culture connected with language, historical memory, native place, family and local traditions. It is demonstrated that the key values of the Epicurean model can be implemented through educational projects, the study of local history, the preservation of family memory, volunteering, intergenerational dialogue, and the creation of digital archives.

Author Biography

Maria Netesova, Tomsk Polytechnic University

Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Senior Teacher of Department of Social Sciences and Humanities of the School of Social Sciences

References

Асмус, В. Ф. (2001). Античная философия. 3-е изд. М.: Высшая школа. 400 c.

Asmus, V. F. (2001). Ancient Philosophy. 3rd ed. Moscow. 400 p. (In Russ.)

Гидденс, Э. (2011). Последствия современности. М.: Праксис. 343 с.

Giddens, A. (2011). The Consequences of Modernity. Moscow. 343 p. (In Russ.)

Диоген Лаэртский. (1986). О жизни, учениях и изречениях знаменитых философов. Пер. с древнегреч. М. Л. Гаспарова; под ред. А. Ф. Лосева. М.: Мысль. 570 с.

Diogenes Laertius. (1986). Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers. Gasparov, M. L. (transl.). Losev, A. F. (ed.). Moscow. 570 p. (In Russ.)

Ильин В. И. (2000). Поведение потребителей. СПб. 223 с.

Ilyin, V. I. (2000). Consumer Behavior. St. Petersburg. 223 p. (In Russ.)

Лешкевич, Т. Г. (2019). Философия науки. М.: ИНФРА–М. 272 с.

Leshkevich, T. G. (2019). Philosophy of Science. Moscow. 272 p. (In Russ.)

Лукреций Кар, Тит. (1947). О природе вещей. Статьи, комментарии, фрагменты Эпикура и Эмпедокла. М.; Л. 699 с.

Lucretius Carus, Titus. (1947). On the Nature of Things. Articles, Commentaries, Fragments of Epicurus and Empedocles. Moscow. Leningrad. 699 p. (In Russ.)

Материалисты Древней Греции: собрание текстов Гераклита, Демокрита и Эпикура. (1955). Под ред. М. А. Дынника. М. 239 с.

Dynnik, M. A. (ed.). (1955). Materialists of Ancient Greece: A Collection of Texts by Heraclitus, Democritus and Epicurus. Moscow. 239 p. (In Russ.)

Селларс, Д. (2022). Философия безмятежности. Тетрафармакос Эпикура: научно-популярное издание. М.: Альпина нон-фикшн. 97 с.

Sellars, J. (2022). The Philosophy of Tranquility: Epicurus’ Tetrapharmakos: A Popular Science Edition. Moscow. 97 p. (In Russ.)

Турчин, А. В. (2011). Структура глобальной катастрофы: риски вымирания человечества в XXI веке: проект российского трансгуманистического движения. М. 431 c.

Turchin, A. V. (2011). The Structure of Global Catastrophe: Risks of Human Extinction in the 21st Century: A Project of the Russian Transhumanist Movement. Moscow. 431 p. (In Russ.)

Ферри, Л. (2018). Краткая история мысли. Трактат по философии для подрастающего поколения. Пер. С. Рындин; под ред. А. Шестакова. М. 272 c.

Ferry, L. (2018). A Brief History of Thought: A Philosophical Treatise for the Younger Generation Ryndin, S. (transl.); Shestakov, A. (ed). Moscow. 272 p. (In Russ.)

Эпикур. (1983). Письмо к Менекею // Тит Лукреций Кар. О природе вещей / Пер. с латин. Ф. Петровского; вступ. ст. Т. Васильевой. М.: Художественная литература. С. 315-319.

Epicurus. (1983). Letter to Menoeceus. In Titus Lucretius Car. On the Nature of Things. Moscow. Pp. 315-319. (In Russ.)

Эпикур. (2024). Главные мысли. С комментариями и иллюстрациями. М. 224 с.

Epicurus. (2024). Principal Doctrines: With Commentaries and Illustrations. Moscow. 224 p. (In Russ.)

Armstrong, A. H. (1967). The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.

Cicero, M. T. (1965). De finibus Bonorum et malorum libri. Hildesheim. Georg Olms.

Irvine, W. B. (2008). A Guide to the Good Life: The Ancient Art of Stoic Joy. Oxford University Press.

Themelis, G., Friar, K. (1973). De Rerum Natura. Boundary 2. A Special Issue on Contemporary Greek Writing. Vol. 1. No. 2. 456 p.

van Oort, J. (1993). Augustine’s Letters to Firmus (1A* and 2*) and the Purpose of the De civitate Dei. In Livingstone, E. (ed.). Studia Patristica XXVII. Oxford-Leuven. Pp. 417-423.

Wilson, K. (2019.) How to Be an Epicurean: The Ancient Art of Living Well. New York. NY Basic Books. 304 p.

Published

2026-10-03

How to Cite

Netesova М. В. (2026). Actualization of the Epicurean Social Model in the Context of Patriotic Education of Future Generations: From the Ancient Polis to Modern Global Society. Respublica Literaria, 7(3), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2026.7.3.38-53