Anti-Russian Separatist Rhetoric: Analysis of the Discursive Space
The article was written as part of the governmental assignment for the realization of the Program on scientific research devoted to the exploration of the ethnic and cultural diversity of Russian society, with the goal of fostering of Russian identity throughout the country (2023–2025), under the supervision of Academician V. A. Tishkov, a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2024.5.4.75-85Keywords:
anti-Russian rhetoric, separatism, discourse, Russian regions.Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the discourse containing anti-Russian separatist ideas and claiming to represent Russian peoples and regions. Using the method of critical discourse studies, the author analyzes the Russian-language segment of the Telegram* (Roskomnadzor: Foreign owner of resource violates Russian law[1]) platform dedicated to the topic under study. As a result of the analysis, the key narratives of this discursive space are identified. Among them are the idea of the inevitability of the collapse of Russia and the independence of individual regions (both republics and individual regions and territories), the idea of the need for decolonization of the Russian state, Russian mass public consciousness; ideas of damage to the peoples of Russia - both historical and allegedly happening at the moment. The main characteristics of the discourse under study are revealed, including the active use of hate speech, the construction of a psychological and cultural distance between “Moscow” and the regions, Russians and other peoples, the dehumanization of the Russian government, its supporters, the Russian people, appeals to history.
[1] In accordance with Part 1 of Article 11 of Federal Law No. 236-FZ dated 07/01/2021 "On the activities of Foreign Persons in the Internet Information and Telecommunications Network on the territory of the Russian Federation", Roskomnadzor decided to notify users of the Telegram messenger that the foreign person responsible for this resource violates the legislation of the Russian Federation.
References
Грачев, М. Н., Лебедев, С. В., Кибардин, К. А. (2024). Психологические операции в современной информационной войне: анализ ключевых антироссийских нарративов. Известия Тульского государственного университета. Гуманитарные науки. Вып. 2. С. 3-17. DOI: 10.24412/2071-6141-2024-2-3-17.
Grachev, M. N., Lebedev, S. V., Kibardin, K. A. (2024). Psychological operations in modern information warfare: an analysis of key anti-Russian narratives. Izvestiya Tula State University. Humanities. Iss. 2. Pp. 3-17. DOI: 10.24412/2071-6141-2024-2-3-17. (In Russ.)
Дейк, Т. А. ван. (2015). Дискурс и власть: репрезентация доминирования в языке и коммуникации. Пер. с англ. Изд. 2-е. М.: УРСС: Книжный дом «ЛИБРОКОМ». 352 с.
Dijk, T. A. van. (2015). Discourse and Power: the Representation of Dominance in Language and Communication. 2 th ed. Moscow. (In Russ.)
Иссерс, О. С. (2015). Дискурсивные практики нашего времени. Изд. 2-е, испр. М.: ЛЕНАНД. 272 с.
Issers, O. S. (2015). Discursive Practices of our Time. 2 nd ed. Moscow. 272 p. (In Russ.)
Колотаев, Ю. Ю. (2022). Политические последствия цифровизации риторики ненависти в эпоху постправды: влияние на эмоциональные режимы в ходе цифровых конфликтов. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Политология. Т. 24. № 3. С. 517 529. DOI: 10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-3-517-529.
Kolotaev, Yu. Yu. (2022). Political Implications of Hate Speech Digitalization in a Post-Truth Era: Impact on Emotional Regimes in Digital Conflicts. RUDN Journal of Political Science. Vol. 24. No. 3. Pp. 517-529. DOI: 10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-3-517-529. (In Russ.)
Озюменко, В. И. (2017). Медийный дискурс в ситуации информационной войны: от манипуляции – к агрессии. Вестник РУДН. Серия: Лингвистика. Т. 21. № 1. С. 203-220. DOI: 10.22363/2312-9182-2017-21-1-203-220.
Ozyumenko, V. I. (2017). Media Discourse in an Atmosphere of Information Warfare: From Manipulation to Aggression. Russian Journal of Linguistics. Vol. 21. No. 1. Pp. 203-220. DOI: 10.22363/2312-9182-2017-21-1-203-220. (In Russ.)
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, Not Ideology: Social Identity Perspective on Polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly. Vol. 76. No. 3. Pp. 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038.
Morelli, A. (2001). Principes Élémentaires de Propagande de Guerre: Utilisables en cas de Guerre Froide, Chaude ou Tiède. Bruxelles. Labor. 93 p.
Ponsonby, A. (1928). Falsehood in War-Time: Containing an Assortment of Lies Circulated Throughout the Nations During the Great War. London. Garland Publishing Company. 193 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://oc.philosophy.nsc.ru/remote.php/webdav/%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%20%D1%81%20%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BC%20RL-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2.doc