Cognitive Archaeology: Between Kant and Vygotsky

Authors

  • Philipp Gerasimov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2024.5.2.9-17

Keywords:

cognitive archaeology, evolution of mind, material engagement, artefacts, practice

Abstract

The paper touches upon the problems of historical development of thought. One of the approaches to the evolution of human cognitive abilities – cognitive archaeology – is considered. The relation of cognitive archaeology to broader debates about the evolution of mind and its specificity is defined. It is shown that in general theoretical and worldview terms, one of the branches of cognitive archaeology is based on evolutionary psychology (in the broad sense) and its inherent (quasi-)Kantian worldview. The second branch is associated with the recognition of the significant role of materiality, material and practical collective activity in the formation of the mind, and in this respect it is much closer to the ideas of cultural-historical approaches than to the Kantian approach. It is argued that the current state of the discipline is predominantly associated with this second strand.

Author Biography

Philipp Gerasimov

independent researcher

References

Бажанов, В. А. (2019). Мозг – культура – социум: кантианская программа в когнитивных исследованиях. М. 288 с.

Bazhanov, V. A. (2019). Brain – culture – society: the Kantian programme in cognitive research. Moscow. 288 p. (In Russ.)

Клейн, Л. С. (2011). История археологической мысли. Т. 2. СПб. 624 с.

Klein, L. S. (2011). History of archaeological thought. Vol. 2. St. Petersburg. 624 р. (In Russ.)

Фаликман, М. В. (2017). Новая волна Выготского в когнитивной науке: разум как незавершенный проект [Электронный ресурс]. Психологические исследования. Т. 10. № 54. URL: https://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/article/view/361 (дата обращения: 25.02.2024).

Falikman, M. V. (2017). New Vygotskian wave in cognitive science: The mind as an unfinished project [Online]. Psychological Research. Vol. 10. No. 54. Available at: https://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/article/view/361 (Accessed: 25 February 2024). (In Russ.)

Abramiuk, M. A. (2021). Evolutionary Psychology and Archaeology. In Shackelford, T. K. (ed.). The SAGE Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Integration of Evolutionary Psychology with other Disciplines. Pp. 257-282.

Brook, A. (2004). Kant, cognitive science, and contemporary neo-Kantianism. Journal of Consciousness Studies (special issue). No. 11. Pp. 1-25.

Brook, A., Wuerth, J. (2023). Kant’s View of the Mind and Consciousness of Self [Online]. In Zalta, E. N. & Nodelman, U. (eds.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2023 Edition). Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/kant-mind/ (Accessed: 25 February 2024).

Cosmides, L., Tooby, J. (1994). Origins of domain specificity: The evolution of functional organization. In Hirschfeld, L. A. and Gelman, S. A. (eds.). Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 85-116.

Demetriou, A., Spanoudis, G. (2018). Growing minds a developmental theory of intelligence, brain, and education. London. Routledge. 333 p.

Haeck, L. (2020). A Kantian Take on Mind Extension. Undergraduate Philosophy Journal of Australasia. Vol. 2. Iss. 2. Pp. 1-18.

Killin, A., Pain, R. (2023). Cognitive Archaeology and the Minimum Necessary Competence Problem. Biological Theory. Vol. 18. Iss. 4. Pp. 269-283.

Lorenz, K. (1978). Behind the mirror. New York. A Harvest / HBJ book. 261 p.

Malafouris, L. (2013). How things shape the mind: A theory of material engagement. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press. 304 p.

Mithen, S., Parsons, L. (2008). The Brain as a Cultural Artefact. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. No. 18. Pp. 415-422.

Over, D. (2003). The rationality of evolutionary psychology. In Bermudez, J. and Millar, A. (eds). Reason and Nature: Essays in the Theory of Rationality. Oxford. Oxford University Press. Pp. 187-207.

Overmann, K. A., Wynn, T. (2019). On tools making minds: an archaeological perspective on human cognitive evolution. Journal of Cognition and Culture. No. 19. Pp. 39-58.

Renfrew, A. C. (1994). Towards a cognitive archaeology. In Renfrew, C. and Zubrow, E. (eds.). The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 3-12.

Schlicht, T., Newen, A. (2015). Kant and Cognitive Science revisited. History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis. Vol. 18. Iss. 1. Pр. 87-113.

Swanson, L. R. (2016). The Predictive Processing Paradigm Has Roots in Kant. Frontiers in systems neuroscience. No. 10. Pp. 1-13.

Wynn, T., Coolidge, F. L. (2022). An Introduction to Evolutionary Cognitive Archaeology. New York and London. Routledge. 136 p.

Published

2024-06-25

How to Cite

Gerasimov Ф. С. (2024). Cognitive Archaeology: Between Kant and Vygotsky. Respublica Literaria, 5(2), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2024.5.2.9-17

Issue

Section

KANT AND RECEPTIONS OF KANTIANISM