Science + Education = ( ≠ ) Education + Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2020.1.1.83-93Keywords:
public administration system, social institutions: education and science, Prussian model, Anglo-Saxon model, ratings, human capital.Abstract
Based on a comparative analysis of the Prussian and Anglo-Saxon models, as well as the implementation of the concepts of didactic encyclopedism and utilitarianism in the education system, the author demonstrates the changes taking place in social institutions – education and science. It is shown that in countries that have long developed under the influence of the public administration system that implemented the model of compulsory education for all, science as a sphere of strategic development of the country determined the content and level of training of graduates. The attempt to include research institutions in universities in the context of the formation of a new Russian system of administration in the field of science and education, as a stage of transition to the implementation of the Anglo-Saxon model, not only violates the logic of the established system of training, but also is a way to substitute real research activity for compliance with the formal criteria of international ratings.
References
Абрамова, М. А., Каменев, Р. В., Крашенинников, В. В. (2018). Высокие технологии: влияние на социальные институты и применение в профессиональном образовании. Новосибирск. Манускрипт.
Abramova, M. A., Kamenev, R. V., Krasheninnikov, V. V. (2018). High technologies: impact on social institutions and application in professional education. Novosibirsk. Manuscript. (In Russ.)
Аблажей, А. М. (2019). Трансформации института науки в современных условиях: анализ исследовательских подходов. Идеи и идеалы. Т. 11. № 2-1. С. 44-62.
Ablazhey, A. M. (2019). Transformations of the Institute of science in modern conditions: analysis of research approaches. Ideas and ideals. Vol. 11. no. 2-1. pp. 44-62. (In Russ.)
Аналитическая записка НАТО об образовании в СССР 1959 г. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://statehistory.ru/4316/Analiticheskaya-zapiska-NATO-ob-obrazovanii-v-SSSR-1959-g-/ (Дата обращения 10. 09. 2020).
NATO analytical note on education in the USSR 1959. [Online]. Available at: https://statehistory.ru/4316/Analiticheskaya-zapiska-NATO-ob-obrazovanii-v-SSSR-1959-g-/ (Accessed: 10. 09. 2020). (In Russ.)
Ефимова, М. Р., Долгих, У. Ф. (2016). Статистическая оценка грамотности населения России: от умения читать до ученых степеней. Вопросы статистики. № 9. С. 77-84.
Efimova, M. R., Dolgikh, U. F. (2016). Statistical assessment of literacy in Russia: from reading skills to academic degrees. Questions about statistics. no. 9. pp. 77-84. (In Russ.)
Карпов, А. О. (2014). «Товаризация» образования против общества знаний. Вестник Российской академии наук. Т. 84. № 5. С. 434-440.
Karpov, A. O. (2014). "Comradeship" of education against the knowledge societ. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Vol. 84. no. 5. pp. 434-440. (In Russ.)
Население России за 100 лет (1897-1997): Стат.сб. (1998). М., Госкомстат России.
Population of Russia for 100 years (1897-1997): stat.sat. Moscow. Goskomstat of Russia. (In Russ.)
Петров, В. В. (2020). Развитие университетских систем в трансформирующихся обществах. Профессиональное образование в современном мире. Т. 10. № 2. С. 3666-3673.
Petrov, V. V. (2020). Development of University systems in transforming societies. Professional education in the modern world. Vol. 10. no. 2. pp. 3666-3673. (In Russ.)
Шнедельбах, Г. (2002) Университет Гумбольдта. Логос. № 3. С. 1-14.
Schnedelbach, G. (2002) Humboldt University. Logos. no. 3. pp. 1-14. (In Russ.)
Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., Andresani, G. (2009). The governance of higher education systems: A public management perspective. In: C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie, E. Ferlie (eds.). University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 1-20. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9515-3 [Online]. Available at: https://www.springer.com/la/book/ 9781402086373 (Accessed: 19. 08. 2020).
Jarzabkowski, P., Sillince J. A. A., Shaw D. (2010) Strategic ambiguity as a rhetorical resource for enabling multiple interests. Human Relations. no 63 (2), pp. 219-248. DOI: 10.1177/0018726709337040
Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2012). Research intensity and knowledge transfer activity in UK universities. Research Policy. no 41. pp. 262-275. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.010
Siegel, D. S., Waldman D., Link A. N. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory research. Research Policy. no 32 (1). pp. 27-48. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2
Sorlin, S. (2007). Funding diversity: performance-based funding regimes as drivers of differentiation in higher education systems. Higher Education Policy. no 20. pp. 413-440. DOI https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300165
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://oc.philosophy.nsc.ru/remote.php/webdav/%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%20%D1%81%20%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BC%20RL-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2.doc
