Problems of Ensuring Russia's Geopolitical Security. Materials of the Meeting of the All-Russian Scientific Webinar on the Problems of Social Sciences and Humanities with International Participation “Connecting Spaces” (26 November 2022)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2022.3.4.181-209Keywords:
geopolitics, Eurasianism, security, Russian foreign policy, Organization of Turkic States.Abstract
Report of Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor I. F. Kefeli is devoted to integration processes and the rivalry of states for influence in the Eurasian space. The philosophy of Eurasianism is used as a methodology for researching the problem. The speaker briefly reviewed the history of the formation of the main ideas of Eurasianism in the works of M. V. Lomonosov, V. I. Lamansky, P. N. Savitsky, N. S. Trubetskoy, G. V. Vernadsky, L. N. Gumilyov. I. F. Kefeli emphasized that Russian geopolitics has Eurasian foundations both in the history of Russia and at the present stage. The report discussed the contradictions and difficulties in implementing the Greater Eurasia project, which initially involves cooperation between states and a breakthrough in technological development. The growth of integration processes between the Turkic states and peoples, some of whom live on the territory of the Russian state, is named in the report as the main source of geopolitical danger for Russia. I. F. Kefeli drew attention to the Russian government's underestimation of the growing danger. The author of the report pointed out that the strengthening of ties between the BRICS countries could become a counterbalance to the integration of the Turkic peoples, which is taking place under Turkish leadership. This counterweight can also be formed within the Eurasian space if Russia consistently participates in three macro-regional projects: the EAEU, the Chinese Silk Road Economic Belt, and the «North-South» logistics project (Russia, Iran, India). In conclusion, the author emphasized the features of the study of geopolitical reality and its political expertise. The discussion of the report was held in the form of a discussion, which revealed the difference in points of view formed on this problem in the Russian scientific community.
References
Анализ и моделирование мировой и страновой динамики: методология и базовые модели. (2015). Отв. ред. В. А. Садовничий, А. А. Акаев, С. Ю. Маков, Л. Е. Гринин. М. Изд-во «Учитель». 272 с.
Sadovnichy, V. A., Akaev, A. A., Malkov, S. Yu., Grinin, L. E. (eds.). (2015). Analysis and modeling of global and country dynamics: methodology and basic models. Moscow. 272 p. (In Russ.)
Веккер, Л. М. (1964). Восприятие и основы его моделирования. Л. Изд-во Ленинградского университета. 194 с.
Wecker, L. M. (1964). Perception and bases of its modeling. Leningrad. 194 p. (In Russ.)
Гобино, Ж. А. де (2016). Опыт о неравенстве человеческих рас. М. Самотека. 664 с.
Gobino, Zh. A. de (2016). An Experiment on the Inequality of Human Races. Moscow. 664 p. (In Russ.)
Гумилев, Л. Н. (1992). «Скажу Вам по секрету, что если Россия будет спасена, то только через евразийство». Социум. № 5. URL: http://gumilevica.kulichki.net/articles/Article28.htm (дата обращения: 03.12.2022).
Gumilyov, L. N. (1992). «I'll tell you a secret that if Russia is saved, then only through Eurasianism». [Online]. Socium. No. 5. Available at: http://gumilevica.kulichki.net/articles/Article28.htm (Accessed: 03 December 2022). (In Russ.)
Ильницкий, А. М. (2021). Обеспечение интеллектуального лидерства – основа национальной безопасности. Военная мысль. 2021. № 1. С. 6-21. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44626024 (дата обращения: 03.12.2022).
Ilnitsky A.M. (2021). Ensuring Intellectual Leadership is the Basis of National Security. [Online]. Military Thought. 2021. No. 1. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44626024 (Accessed: 03 December 2022). (In Russ.)
Лайнбарджер, П. (2015). Психологическая война. Теория и практика обработки массового сознания. М. Центрополиграф. 445 с.
Linebarger, P. (2015). Psychological Warfare. Theory and Practice of Mass Consciousness Processing. Moscow. 445 p.
Советская цивилизация и евразийская идея: две истории длинною в век (к 100-летию образования СССР и становления евразийства). (2022). Под ред. д-ра филос. наук, проф. И. Ф. Кефели; предисловие академика РАН С. Ю. Глазьева. СПб.: ИД «Петрополис». 532 с.
Kefeli, I. F. (ed.) (2022). Soviet civilization and the Eurasian idea: two centuries-long stories (on the 100th anniversary of the formation of the USSR and the formation of Eurasianism). Glazyev, S. Yu. (preface). St. Petersburg. 532 p. (In Russ.)
Трубецкой, Н. С. (1927). Общеевразийский национализм. Евразийская хроника. Вып. 9. Париж. С. 24-31.
Trubetskoy, N. S. (1927). Common Eurasian nationalism. Eurasian Chronicle. Iss. 9. Paris. pp. 24-31. (In Russ.)
The Global Risks Report 2017. 12th Edition. World Economic Forum. (2017). Geneva. 78 p.
Miller, George A. (1963). Language and communication. New York. McGraw-Hill.
Wilson, D., Purushothaman, R. (2003). Dreaming with BRICs: The Path to 2050. Global Economics. № 99.
Cluzel François du. (2021). Cognitive Warfare. [Online]. Innovation Hub. 45 p. Available at: https://www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/20210113_CW%20Final%20v2%20. pdf (Accessed: 03 December 2022).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://oc.philosophy.nsc.ru/remote.php/webdav/%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%20%D1%81%20%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BC%20RL-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2.doc
