Ριζωματα – four foundations of the universe

Authors

  • Anna Afonasina Institute of Philosophy and Law, NSU
  • Xenia Kovalchuk Institute of Philosophy and Law, NSU

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2022.3.3.5-18

Keywords:

Empedocles, cosmology, roots, acting forces, gods, plurality

Abstract

Empedocles believed that everything in the world could be explained by four “roots” and two acting forces. Since Aristotle's time, these four “roots” have been called “elements,” which has greatly distorted the perception of Empedocles' philosophy. Let us ask ourselves - can we really attribute to Empedocles the idea of “roots” as material particles endowed with definite and clearly defined characteristics? A careful reading of the surviving fragments of Empedocles' poem confronts us rather with uncertainty. Empedocles resorts to various ways of representing them, thus confusing the listener. One has the feeling that, with the numerous epithets and names inherent in the roots,

he himself was only trying to find the best way of understanding them. In this article we turn to a large number of fragments in which names, epithets, characteristics, or metaphorical descriptions of roots are mentioned. After carefully analyzing them and offering our own translations into Russian, we come to the conclusion that the understanding of the roots cannot be reduced to simple elements. They are described as gods, as natural elements, as the smallest particles, from the mixture of which everything in the world can be composed. This study shows once again that Empedocles was an outstanding and original thinker, whose ideas cannot be reduced to simple and comprehensible forms.

Author Biographies

Anna Afonasina, Institute of Philosophy and Law, NSU

Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Institute of Philosophy and Law, NSU

Xenia Kovalchuk, Institute of Philosophy and Law, NSU

senior lab assistant in Institute of Philosophy and Law, NSU

References

Афонасин, Е. В. (2020). Гераклид Понтийский. Фрагменты и свидетельства. СПб.

Afonasin, E. V. (2020). Heraclides of Pontus. Fragments and Testimonia. St. Petersburg. (In Russ.)

Афонасина, А. С. (2015). Эмпедокл о дыхании. ΣΧΟΛΗ (Schole). T. 9.2. С. 353-362.

Afonasina, A. S. (2015). Empedocles on breathing. ΣΧΟΛΗ (Schole). Vol. 9.2. pp. 353-362. (In Russ.)

Афонасина, А. С. (2021). Страсбургский папирус Эмпедокла. Перевод и комментарий. Новосибирск.

Afonasina, A. S. (2021). The Strasbourg papyrus of Empedocles. A translation into Russian and commentaries. Novosibirsk. (In Russ.)

Афонасина, А. С. (2022). Образ Эмпедокла в трактатах гиппократовского корпуса и интерпретация некоторых биографических сведений. Вестник СПбГУ. Философия и конфликтология. Т. 38. № 3. С. 293-306.

Afonasina, A. S. (2022). The image of Empedocles in the Hippocratic treatises and the interpretation of some biographical evidences. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies. Vol. 38. no. 3. pp. 293-306. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.302. (In Russ.)

Панченко, Д. В. (2019). Формирование представления о шарообразности Солнца в греческой философии и науке. ΣΧΟΛΗ (Schole). T. 13.1. C. 234-250.

Panchenko, D. V. (2019). The emergence of the idea of a spherical sun in Greek science and philosophy. ΣΧΟΛΗ (Schole). Vol. 13.1. pp. 234-250. (In Russ.)

Федорова, О. Б. (2005). Четыре элемента Эмпедокла: текстологический анализ фрагментов. Вопросы истории естествознания и техники. Т. 26. № 2. С. 18-65.

Fedorova, O. B. (2005). The four elements in Empedocles: a textual analyses of the fragments. Studies in the History of Science and Technology. Vol. 26. no. 2. pp. 18-65. (In Russ.)

Федорова, О. Б. (2010). «Играющее дитя», или фрагмент Эмпедокла о дыхании в свете филологического анализа. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 7: Философия. № 2. C. 3-34.

Fedorova, O. B. (2010). “The playing child” or Empedocles’ fragment about breathing in the light of philological analysis. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 7: Philosophy. no. 2. pp. 3 34. (In Russ.)

Guthrie, W. K. C. (1979). A History of Greek Philosophy. Vol. 2: The Presocratic Tradition from Parmenides to Democritus. Cambridge University Press.

Millerd, C. E. (1908). On the Interpretation of Empedocles. Chicago.

Picot, J-C. (2014). Un nom énigmatique de l'air chez Empédocle (fr. 21.4 DK). Les Études philosophiques. no. 110. pp. 343-373.

Russell, A. D., Konstan, D. (2005). Heraclitus: Homeric problems. Society of Biblical Literature. Atlanta.

Wright, M. R. (1981). Empedocles the Extant Fragments. Yale University Press.

Published

2022-10-20

How to Cite

Afonasina А. С. ., & Kovalchuk К. С. . (2022). Ριζωματα – four foundations of the universe. Respublica Literaria, 3(3), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2022.3.3.5-18