Tense in the Context of B-theories

Authors

  • Alina Zaykova Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2022.3.2.40-49

Keywords:

time, old B-theory, new B-theory, the passage of time, temporal properties, tensed propositions

Abstract

The importance of tense for choosing a theory of time is now at the center of the discourse on time and the perception of time. First of all, the discussion is between supporters of the A-theory and supporters of the B‑theories. Supporters of the “old B-theory” defended the point of view that we can refuse tense without big problems. However, attempts to construct an ideal tenseless language have not been successful. As a result, supporters of the “new B-theory” suggested that the essentiality of tenses does not entail the essentiality of temporal modes, since tense is essential only for a person and his timely actions. To some extent, such a statement weakens the strong version of B‑theory, which denies the essentiality of A-properties, but strengthens the version of it that takes in consideration of experience.

Author Biography

Alina Zaykova, Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Junior Researcher

References

Dyke, H. (2002). Tokens, dates, and Tenseless Truth Conditions. Synthese. no. 131. pp. 329 351.

Figg, T. (2017). The Old Tenseless Theory: Back from the Dead? Philosophia. no. 45. pp. 1167 1178.

Kaplan, D. (1989). Demonstratives. In Almog, J., Perry, J. and Wettstein, H. (eds.) Themes From Kaplan. Oxford. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.

Markosian, N. (2020). The Dynamic Theory of Time and Time Travel to the Past. Disputatio. Vol. XII. no. 57. pp. 137-165.

McTaggart, J. E. M. (1908). The Unreality of Time. Mind. no. 18. pp. 457-474.

Mellor, D. H. (1981). Real Time. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

Oaklander, L. N. (1991). A Defence of the New Tenseless Theory of Time. The Philosophical Quarterly. Vol. 41. no. 162. pp. 26-38.

Oaklander, L. N. (2005). Time and Tense: Philosophical Aspects. In Brown, K. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. 2nd Ed. Vol. 12. pp. 554-557.

Oaklander, L. N. (2014). Temporal Realism and the R-Theory. In Bonino G., Jesson G. and Cumpa J. (eds.) Defending Realism: Ontological and Epistemological Investigations. Berlin. München. Boston. De Gruyter. pp. 123-140.

Orilia, F., & Oaklander, L. N. (2015). Do We Really Need a New B-theory of Time? Topoi. no. 34(1). pp. 157-170.

Smart, J. J. C. (1980). Time and Becoming. In van Inwagen, P. (ed.). Time and Cause: Essays in Honor of Richard Taylor. Boston. Reidel. pp 3-15

Published

2022-07-12

How to Cite

Zaykova А. С. (2022). Tense in the Context of B-theories. Respublica Literaria, 3(2), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2022.3.2.40-49