On the Decadent Nature of Hellenistic Philosophy

Authors

  • Vladimir Brovkin Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2022.3.2.31-39

Keywords:

Hellenism, Hegel, E. Zeller, Stoics, Epicurus, skeptics, moral and practical philosophy, individualism, the decline of the polis

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to identify the factors that influenced the formation of the idea of the decadent nature of Hellenistic philosophy. It is established that Hegel and E. Zeller played an important role in the formation of this idea. The formation of the idea of the inferiority of Hellenistic philosophy was influenced by the problem of sources. Serious gaps in the sources led to a distorted view of the philosophy of Hellenism. Underestimation of the philosophical teachings of Hellenism is the result of the idea of their moral and practical orientation and a low level of speculative and scientific. The negative attitude towards the philosophy of the Stoics, Epicureans and skeptics was promoted by the idea of the dominance of individualism in these teachings. The last factor is the thesis about the decadent nature of the Hellenistic era, which was caused by the loss of political freedom by the Greeks

Author Biography

Vladimir Brovkin, Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Research Officer

References

Адо, П. (1999). Что такое античная философия? М.

Ado, P. (1999). What is Ancient Philosophy? Moscow. (In Russ.)

Виндельбанд, В. (1995). История древней философии. Киев.

Windelband, W. (1995). History of Ancient Philosophy. Kiev. (In Russ.)

Гегель, Г. В. Ф. (1932). Лекции по истории философии. Гегель, Г. В. Ф. Сочинения. Кн. 2. Т. X. М.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1932). Lectures on the History of Philosophy. In Hegel, G. V. F. Essays. Book 2. Vol. X. Moscow. (In Russ.)

Гегель, Г. В. Ф. (1978). Политические сочинения. М.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1978). Political Writings. Moscow. (In Russ.)

Ковалев, С. И. (1936). Эллинизм. Рим. Л.

Kovalev, S. I. (1936). Hellenism. Rome. Leningrad. (In Russ.)

Поленц, М. (2015). Стоя. История духовного движения. СПб.

Polenz, M. (2015). Stoa. History of the Spiritual Movement. St. Petersburg. (In Russ.)

Рассел, Б. (1998). Мудрость Запада: Историческое исследование западной философии в связи с общественными и политическими обстоятельствами. М.

Russel, B. (1998). Wisdom of the West: A Historical Survey of Western Philosophy in Its Social and Political Setting. Moscow. (In Russ.)

Татаркевич, Вл. (2000). История философии. Античная и средневековая философия. Пермь.

Tatarkevich, W. (2000). History of Philosophy. Ancient and Medieval Philosophy. Perm. (In Russ.)

Целлер, Э. (1996). Очерк истории греческой философии. СПб.

Zeller, E. (1996). Outlines of the History of Greek Philosophy. St. Petersburg. (In Russ.)

Erskine, A. (2003). Approaching the Hellenistic World. In Erskine, A. (ed.). A Companion to the Hellenistic World. Oxford. pp. 1-15.

Reale, G. (1985). A History of Ancient Philosophy. III. The Systems of Hellenistic Age. Catan, J. R. (ed.). State University of New York.

Sharples, R. W. (1996). Stoics, Epicureans and Sceptics: An Introduction to Hellenistic Philosophy. London, New York.

Sharples, R. W. (2007). Philosophy for Life. In Bugh, G. R. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to the Hellenistic World. Cambridge. pp. 223-240.

Zeller, E. (1880). Stoics, Epicureans and Sceptics. London.

Published

2022-07-12

How to Cite

Brovkin В. В. . (2022). On the Decadent Nature of Hellenistic Philosophy. Respublica Literaria, 3(2), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2022.3.2.31-39