A Historical Turn in Analytical Philosophy and Neopragmatism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2022.3.1.46-53Keywords:
analytical philosophy, historical turn, pragmatism, neo-pragmatism, humanismAbstract
After the collapse of the “Atlantic Wall” and the breaking of the boundaries between continental and analytic philosophy, there has been a historical turn in analytic philosophy, and contrary to expectations of the emergence of post-analytic philosophy on the philosophical scene, neo-pragmatism took that place, although these terms indicate in a rough way the same phenomenon. This situation demonstrates the modern definition of analytical philosophy as a technique and toolkit rather than a set of problems that define a philosophical tradition. Neopragmatism, in turn, was more consistent with the maintenance of humanistic intellectual traditions, satisfying substantive needs, which by the beginning of the XXI century. come to the foregraund, pushing back the sophisticated logical toolkit and the elitist method, unsuitable for the mass consumer of philosophical knowledge that was formed during this period.
References
Боррадори, Дж. (1998). Американский философ: Беседы с Куайном, Дэвидсоном, Патнэмом, Нозиком, Данто, Рорти, Кейвлом, МакИнтайром, Куном. М.
Borradori, G. (1998). The American Philosopher. Quine, Davidson, Putnam, Nozick, Danto, Rorty, Cavell, MacIntyre, and Kuhn. Moscow. (In Russ.)
Косарев, А. В. (2020a). Второй этап творчества Р. Бернсатйна как критический неопрагматизм. Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. № 55. С. 118-126.
Kosarev, A. V. (2020a). The Second Period of Richard Bernstein’s Work as Critical Neopragmatism. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. no. 55. pp. 118-126. (In Russ.)
Косарев, А. В. (2020б). Основания релятивизма Дж. Марголиса в споре Р. Рорти и Х. Патнэма. Respublica Literaria. Т. 1. № 2. С. 79-87.
Kosarev, A. V. (2020b) Foundations of Relativism by J. Margolis in the Polemic of R. Rorty and H. Putnam. Respublica Literaria. Vol. 1. no. 2. pp. 79-87. (In Russ.)
Макинтайр, А. (2021). Отношение философии к своему прошлому. Философия и ее история. Дискуссии. Новосибирск. С. 103-135.
Macintyre, A. (2021). Philosophy's Relationship to its Past. Philosophy and its Past. Discussions. Novosibirsk. pp. 103-135. (In Russ.)
Пассмор, Дж. (2002). Современные философы. Пер. с англ. Л. Б. Макеевой. М.
Passmore, J. (2002). Recent Philosophers. Makeeva, L. B. (transl.). Moscow. (In Russ.)
Пассмор, Дж. (1998). Сто лет философии. Пер. с англ. И. В. Борисовой, Л. Б. Макеевой, А. М. Руткевича. М.
Passmore, J. (1998). A Hundred Years of Philosophy. Borisova, I. V., Makeeva, L. B., Rutkevich, A. M. (transl.). Moscow. (In Russ.)
Селларс, У. (2021). Эмпиризм и философия сознания. Введение Р. Рорти. Комментарии Р. Брэндома. Пер. с англ. Г. С. Рогоняна. Научн. ред. Л. Б. Макеева. СПб.
Sellars, W. (2021). Empirism and Philosophy of Mind. Rorty, R. (introd.). Brandom, R. (comment.). Rogonyan, G. S. (transl.). Makeeva, L. B. (ed.). St. Petersburg. (In Russ.)
Фуллер, С. (2021). Постправда: Знание как борьба за власть. М.
Fuller, S. (2021). Post-Truth: Knowledge as a Power Game. Moscow. (In Russ.)
Шиллер, Ф. (2003). Гуманизм и гуманизмы. Шиллер Ф. Наши человеческие истины. М. С. 74-89.
Schiller, F. C. S. (2003). Humanism and Humanisms. Schiller F. C. S. Our Human Truths. Moscow. pp. 74-89. (In Russ.)
Margolis, J. (2010). Pragmatism's Advantage: American and European Philosophy at the End of the Twentieth Century. Stanford.
Preston, A. (2007). Analytic Philosophy. The History of Illusion. London. New York.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://oc.philosophy.nsc.ru/remote.php/webdav/%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%20%D1%81%20%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BC%20RL-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2.doc